# The Promises—and Perils—of Ocean Desalination
![rw-book-cover](https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/c_fill,f_auto,fl_progressive,g_center,h_675,pg_1,q_80,w_1200/9ec61818feee29f9efd0ed44d2287a92.png)
## Metadata
- Author:: [[Molly Taft]]
- Full Title:: The Promises—and Perils—of Ocean Desalination
- Category: #articles
- URL: https://gizmodo.com/why-cant-we-desalinate-ocean-water-drinking-1849556882
## Highlights
> It takes a *lot* of energy to suck ocean water through that almost-impermeable membrane, meaning that desal plants, if they’re connected to a fossil-fueled grid, can add to climate change-charged droughts like the one in the U.S. West ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01gxet532s17650yv8hnmctkwh))
> A 2016 [analysis](https://pacinst.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/PI_TheCostofAlternativeWaterSupplyEfficiencyOptionsinCA.pdf) from the Pacific Institute found that ocean desalination plants like the Huntington Beach project would produce water at a median cost of $2,100 per acre-foot, making it one of the most expensive methods of providing freshwater. ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01gxet7bftet81qkq04fhzpxm0))
> Pacific Institute analysis found that stormwater capture projects could provide water for around $590 per acre-foot ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01gxet6tx17yrx0rkdtvdm4hvq))
> Recycled water projects, meanwhile, are more expensive than stormwater capture but significantly cheaper than ocean desalination. ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01gxet7ka82vams6a4g48pkrfv))
> said. “Why should a company like Poseidon be pushing a rock up the hill, when they could be pushing it down the hill and be doing more cycling?” ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01gxet82t2wnsj4nsf63c2xedz))
> producing [5 million gallons](https://www.epa.gov/wifia/doheny-ocean-desalination-project) of water per day versus 50 million) and would mainly serve a population that currently [pays](https://calmatters.org/environment/2022/10/desalination-plants-california/) high prices for water imported from other areas, whose supply lines are at risk from earthquakes or droughts ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01gxeta20t1fmkzjptyk2bwasq))
# The Promises—and Perils—of Ocean Desalination
![rw-book-cover](https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/c_fill,f_auto,fl_progressive,g_center,h_675,pg_1,q_80,w_1200/9ec61818feee29f9efd0ed44d2287a92.png)
## Metadata
- Author:: [[Molly Taft]]
- Full Title:: The Promises—and Perils—of Ocean Desalination
- Category: #articles
- URL: https://gizmodo.com/why-cant-we-desalinate-ocean-water-drinking-1849556882
## Highlights
> It takes a *lot* of energy to suck ocean water through that almost-impermeable membrane, meaning that desal plants, if they’re connected to a fossil-fueled grid, can add to climate change-charged droughts like the one in the U.S. West ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01gxet532s17650yv8hnmctkwh))
> A 2016 [analysis](https://pacinst.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/PI_TheCostofAlternativeWaterSupplyEfficiencyOptionsinCA.pdf) from the Pacific Institute found that ocean desalination plants like the Huntington Beach project would produce water at a median cost of $2,100 per acre-foot, making it one of the most expensive methods of providing freshwater. ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01gxet7bftet81qkq04fhzpxm0))
> Pacific Institute analysis found that stormwater capture projects could provide water for around $590 per acre-foot ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01gxet6tx17yrx0rkdtvdm4hvq))
> Recycled water projects, meanwhile, are more expensive than stormwater capture but significantly cheaper than ocean desalination. ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01gxet7ka82vams6a4g48pkrfv))
> said. “Why should a company like Poseidon be pushing a rock up the hill, when they could be pushing it down the hill and be doing more cycling?” ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01gxet82t2wnsj4nsf63c2xedz))
> producing [5 million gallons](https://www.epa.gov/wifia/doheny-ocean-desalination-project) of water per day versus 50 million) and would mainly serve a population that currently [pays](https://calmatters.org/environment/2022/10/desalination-plants-california/) high prices for water imported from other areas, whose supply lines are at risk from earthquakes or droughts ([View Highlight](https://read.readwise.io/read/01gxeta20t1fmkzjptyk2bwasq))